ANALYSIS OF WEED VEGETATION ON PLANTATIONS KENAF (Hibiscus cannabinuS L.) IN DLIMAS, CEPER, KLATEN, CENTRAL JAVA

Ahmad Nur Rohim, Dwi Cahyo Budi Bhakti Bumi, Refido Arian Thohari

Abstract


Weed vegetation analysis is very necessary in controlling weeds in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) plantations because weeds can compete in taking nutrients, water, sunlight, air, and growing space. A study on the analysis of weed vegetation in kenaf plantations was carried out in March 2022 in Dlimas Village, Ceper District, Klaten Regency, Central Java. This study aims to obtain the diversity of weed species and structures which include species, density, frequency, and weed dominance as the basis for proper, effective, and efficient control. The research was conducted by random sampling technique using the square method of 0.5 m x 0.5 m plot size with 3 replications. Furthermore, weeds in the sample plots were taken and identified using plantnet software to be matched with references. The results showed that there were 8 species of grass weeds, 3 species of tekian weeds, and 6 species of broadleaf weeds. Weeds found in kenaf plantations were dominated by broadleaf species. The three dominant weeds were Lindernia dubia L. Pennel (SDR 25,80 %), Eleusine indica L. Gaertn (SDR 8,90 %), and Phyllanthus urinaria (SDR 7,90 %).


Keywords


vegetation analysis, weeds, kenaf, SDR value

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brink, M. and R.P. Escobin (ed). 2003. PROSEA. Plant Resources of South-East Asia. No. 17. Fibre Plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands. P. 456.

El-Rokiek, K.G., S.A.S. El-Din, F.A.A. Sahara. 2010. Allelopathic behavior of Cyperus rotundus L. on both Chorchorus olitorius (broad leaved weed) and Echinochloa crus-galli (grassy weed) assosiated with soybean. J. Plant Prot. Res 50(1) :274-279.

Farhan, M. R., Lestari, S., Adawiyah, R. M. K., Asiyah, N., Nasrullah, M., Triastuti, A., Hasriaty. 2019. Analisis Vegetasi Tumbuhan di Resort Pattunuang-Karaenta Taman Nasional Bantimurung Bulusaraung. Jurusan Biologi FMIPA UNM. Makassar. Hlm 53.

Hambali, Dani. Edison P, E. Harso K. 2015. Dose Response Biotip Rumput Belulang (Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.) Resisten-Parakuat Terhadap Parakuat, Diuron, Dan Ametrin. Jurnal Online Agroekoteknologi 3(2): 574-580.

Heap, Ian. 2018. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weed http://www.weedscience.org. [Diakses 15 Maret 2022].

Heddy. 2012. Metode Analisis Vegetasi dan Komunitas. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta. Hlm 165.

Imaniasita, V., Liana, T., & Pamungkas, D. S. 2020. Identifikasi Keragaman dan Dominansi Gulma pada Lahan Pertanaman Kedelai. Agrotechnology Research Journal 4(1): 11-16.

Indriyanto. 2012. Ekologi Hutan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Kusuma, A. V. C., Chozin, M. A., & Guntoro, D. 2017. Senyawa fenol dari tajuk dan umbi teki (Cyperus rotundus L.) pada berbagai umur pertumbuhan serta pengaruhnya terhadap perkecambahan gulma berdaun lebar. Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) 45(1): 100-107.

Kwon, Oh-Do., Kyu-Nam A., Yee L., Seo-Ho S., Heung-Gyu P., Hae-Ryoung S., Byeong-Cheol M., and Yong-In K. 2011. Rice Yield Loss and Economic Threshold Levels by Densities of Scirpus planiculmis and Lindernia dubia in Wet-Seeded Rice Paddy Fields. Korean Journal of Weed Science 31(4):348-354.

Listyowati, C. 2016. Analisis vegetasi gulma pada pertanaman ubi kayu di lahan kering di Kecamatan Paliyan Kabupaten Gunungkidul. Prosiding Seminar Hasil Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi. Hlm 494-499.

Moelyaandani, D. Q., Setiyono. 2020. Kompetisi beberapa jenis gulma terhadap pertumbuhan awal beberapa varietas tanaman tebu (Saccharum officinarum L.). Jurnal Proteksi Tanaman Tropis 1(1): 21-26.

Muharrami R. 2011. Analisis Vegetasi Gulma Pada Pertanaman jagung (Zea mays L.) di Lahan Kering dan Lahan Sawah Di Malampah, Kabupaten Pasaman. Fakutas MIPA, Universitas Andalas.

Pasau P, Prapto Y dan A. Syukur. 2008. Pergeseran Komposisi Gulma pada Perbedaan Proporsi Populasi Jagung dan Kacang Tanah dalam Tumpangsari pada Regosol Sleman. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian 16 (2): 60-78.

Prasad, M. G., & Sunojkuma, Y. 2014. First record of Lindernia dubia (Linderniaceae) in India and reduction of Lindernia nelliyampathiensis as one of its synonyms. Phytotaxa 184(3): 165-169.

Prasatya, Andika Fajar . 2018. Pengaruh Takaran Pupuk N Dan Pupuk Kandang Ayam Terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Hasil Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) (Skripsi). Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta.

Rahmanzadeh, R., Müller, K., Fischer, E., Bartels, D., & Borsch, T. (2005). The Linderniaceae and Gratiolaceae are further lineages distinct from the Scrophulariaceae (Lamiales). Plant Biology 7(1): 67-78.

Rochmah, Aulia. 2017. Uji Resistensi Gulma Eleusine indica, Erigeron sumatrensis, Dan Cyperus kyllingia Dari Perkebunan Jambu Biji di Lampung Timur Terhadap Herbisida Parakuat [Skripsi]. Lampung: Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Lampung.

Saba, N., M.T. Paridah, M. Jawaid, K. Abdan, and N.A. Ibrahim. 2015. Potential utilization of kenaf biomass in different applications. In K.R. Hakeem et al. (ed) Agricultural Biomass Based Potential Materials. Springer International Publishing. Switzerland. pp 1-34.

Shamsudin, R., H. Abdullah, and S.C. Sinang. 2015. Properties of oil sorbent material produced from kenaf fiber. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development 6(7): 551-554.

Steed S, Marble C, Boyd NS, MacRae A, Fnu K, 2015. Biology and Management of Goosegrass (Eleusine Indica (L.) Gaetrn.) in Ornamental Plant Production. University of Florida

Sulaksana. J. 2004. Meniran, Budi Daya dan Pemanfaatan untuk Obat. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya.

Syaifudin, A., & Nofa, F. A. 2020. Types of Rice Weeds (Oryza sativa L.) in Agricultural Land in Terban Village, Warungasem District, Batang Regency, Central Java. Biologica Samudra 2(2): 128-136.

Tanjung Morawa. Crowder, and Chheda. 1982. Tropical Grassland Husbandry. New York: Longman Inc.

Widayat, D., Umiyati, U., & Sumekar, Y. 2021. Campuran herbisida IPA glifosat, imazetafir, dan karfentrazon-etil dalam mengendalikan gulma daun lebar, gulma daun sempit, dan teki. Kultivasi 20(1): 47-52.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31315/agrivet.v28i1.6875

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.31315/agrivet.v28i1.6875.g4563

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Indexed by: