Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Teknik (ISSN 0852-1697; http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/teknik) adalah peer-reviewed journalyang mempublikasikan artikel-artikel ilmiah dari berbagai disiplin ilmu rekayasa/keteknikan. Jurnal Teknik diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro. Jurnal Teknik menerima manuskrip atau artikel dalam bidang teknik/rekayasa dari berbagai kalangan akademisi dan peneliti baik nasional maupun internasional. Artikel-artikel yang dipublikasikan di jurnal Teknik meliputi hasil-hasil penelitian ilmiah asli (prioritas utama), artikel ulasan ilmiah yang bersifat baru (tidak prioritas), atau komentar atau kritik terhadap tulisan yang ada di jurnal Teknik.Jurnal Teknik (ISSN 0852-1697; http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/teknik) adalah peer-reviewed journalyang mempublikasikan artikel-artikel ilmiah dari berbagai disiplin ilmu rekayasa/keteknikan. Jurnal Teknik diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro. Jurnal Teknik menerima manuskrip atau artikel dalam bidang teknik/rekayasa dari berbagai kalangan akademisi dan peneliti baik nasional maupun internasional. Artikel-artikel yang dipublikasikan di jurnal Teknik meliputi hasil-hasil penelitian ilmiah asli (prioritas utama), artikel ulasan ilmiah yang bersifat baru (tidak prioritas), atau komentar atau kritik terhadap tulisan yang ada di jurnal Teknik.Jurnal Teknik (ISSN 0852-1697; http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/teknik) adalah peer-reviewed journalyang mempublikasikan artikel-artikel ilmiah dari berbagai disiplin ilmu rekayasa/keteknikan. Jurnal Teknik diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro. Jurnal Teknik menerima manuskrip atau artikel dalam bidang teknik/rekayasa dari berbagai kalangan akademisi dan peneliti baik nasional maupun internasional. Artikel-artikel yang dipublikasikan di jurnal Teknik meliputi hasil-hasil penelitian ilmiah asli (prioritas utama), artikel ulasan ilmiah yang bersifat baru (tidak prioritas), atau komentar atau kritik terhadap tulisan yang ada di jurnal Teknik.

OPSI is a journal that publishes scientific articles from the Industrial Engineering discipline. OPSI is published by the Industrial Engineering Study Program of UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta. OPSI accepts manuscripts or articles in industrial engineering from various academics and researchers, both nationally and internationally. The articles published in OPSI include the results of scientific research covering fields of study, including:

Production System
Work system design and ergonomics
Industrial Management
Supply Chain
Inventory System
Scheduling System
Performance measurement
Industrial Automation System
Optimization
Simulation
Reliability
Maintenance management
Economics Engineering
Manufacturing process and
other relevant fields of study

Section Policies

Artikel

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

The review process is carried out in a single-blind review.

First Rejection, a review process will be carried out by another reviewer. If it is rejected twice, the manuscript will be rejected. However, if the second reviewer recommends revision/accepts, then the editorial board may consider revision according to the editorial board meeting decision results.

Articles submitted to OPSI will be reviewed by a reviewer appointed by the editor according to their field of expertise.

Confirmation of acceptance/rejection of the manuscript will be notified via email.

The review results are scheduled for no later than one month after being sent to the reviewer. If the reviewer has not submitted the review results within one month, the editorial board will ask another reviewer to review the submitted paper.

Authors are given the opportunity for two weeks to make improvements (revisions) to the manuscript according to reviewers' and editors' suggestions.

The decision to accept or reject the manuscript is the authority of the Chief Editor/Editor/Editor.

The decision to accept or reject the manuscripts is made by the editorial board once a month.

The review process is based on 10 variables, these are:

Relevance
Novelty
Contribution
Writing presentation
Background
Method
Analysis
Conclusion
Sustainability
Reference

The LOA will be sent to the author if the manuscript has been accepted by the editor. Please be noted that the review process may take some period of time.

The review process is according to the reviewer's time to review the manuscript and the author's time to revise the manuscript.

Publication Frequency

The OPSI journal is published twice a year in June and December since 2007.

Open Access Policy

OPSI provides readers with open access to download and read the contents of the journal. This journal fully supports the commitment to exchange information and knowledge to the public. All articles are open access, yet, readers are not allowed to change the contents of the article without the permission of the publisher.

Plagiarism Screening

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Jurnal TEKNIK (ISSN 0852-1697) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed TEKNIK journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.

Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University as publisher of TEKNIK journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue
has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Faculty of Engineering Diponegoro Universityand Editorial Board will assist in
communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and
necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the TEKNIK journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

OPSI journal performs a plagiarism checking process using Turnitin. The submitted paper must have plagiarism checking value below 25%. In addition, the authors are also asked to include supplementary files in the form of a plagiarism-free statement

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Based on REGULATION OF THE HEAD OF INDONESIAN SCIENCE INSTITUTIONS NUMBER 2 OF 2014

The code of ethics of researchers is a moral reference for researchers in researching the development of science and technology for humanity. This is a form of devotion and social responsibility, and devotion to God Almighty under the regulation of the Head of LIPI Number 06/E/2013 concerning the Code of Ethics for Researchers. Researchers who are legally proven to have violated the ethics of researchers are dismissed from their research positions. Provisions regarding violations of researcher ethics are further regulated through the Regulation of the Head of LIPI Number 06/E/2013 concerning the Code of Ethics of Researchers and the Regulation of the Head of LIPI Number 08/E/2013 concerning Clearance Guidelines for Research Ethics and Scientific Publications.

The code of ethics for publication is a statement of the code of ethics of all parties involved in the publication process in scientific journals, namely managers, editors, review partners, and authors. This statement of the code of ethics for scientific publications is based on the Committee on Publication Ethics adopted in the Regulation of the Head of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications. In essence, the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications is to uphold three ethical values in publications, namely (i) neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications; (ii) justice, namely granting authorship rights to those entitled as writers; and (iii) honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Journal Manager Duties and Responsibilities

Determine the name of the journal, scientific scope, periodicity, and accreditation if needed.
Determine the membership of the editorial board.
Defines the relationship between publishers, editors, review partners, and other parties to a contract.
Appreciate confidential things, both for contributing researchers, authors/writers, editors, and review partners.
Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright. Conduct a review of the journal's policy and submit it to the authors/authors, the editorial board, reviewers, and readers.
Create behavioural code guides for editors and review partners.
Publish journals regularly.
Ensuring the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publications.
Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
Prepare permits and other legal aspects.

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

Meeting the needs of readers and authors/writers,
Strive to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis,
Implement processes to ensure the quality of published papers,
Prioritizing freedom of opinion objectively,
Maintain the integrity of the author's academic track record,
Submit corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies when necessary,
Responsible for the style and format of the written word, while the content and all statements in the written work are the responsibility of the author/writer.
Actively solicit the opinion of authors, readers, review partners, and members of the editorial board to improve the quality of publications,
Encouraging an assessment of the journal if there are findings,
Support initiatives to reduce research and publication errors by asking authors to attach an Ethics Clearance form that has been approved by the Ethics Clearance Commission,
Support initiatives to educate researchers on publication ethics,
Reviewing the effect of publication policies on the attitudes of authors/writers and peer reviewers and improving them to increase responsibility and minimize errors,
Have an open mind to new opinions or the views of others that may conflict with personal opinions,
Not defending one's own opinion, the author or a third party that may result in an unobjective decision,
Encouraging authors/writers to improve their written work so that it is worthy of publication.

Reviewers Duties and Responsibilities

Received an assignment from the editor to review the paper and submit the study results to the editor as material for determining the feasibility of a written work to be published.
The reviewer may not conduct a review of the written work that involves himself, either directly or indirectly.
Maintain the author's privacy by not disseminating the results of corrections, suggestions, and recommendations by providing criticism, suggestions, input, and recommendations
Encouraging writers to make improvements to their writings
Reviewing the written work that has been corrected according to predetermined standards.
According to the style of the publication environment, the written work is reviewed on time based on scientific principles (data collection methods, author's legality, conclusions, etc.).

Author's Duties and Responsibilities

Ensure that those who are included in the list of authors meet the criteria as authors.
Collectively responsible for the work and the article's content includes methods, analysis, calculations and details.
State the origin of resources (including funding), either directly or indirectly.
Explain the limitations of the research Respond to comments made by reviewers in a professional and timely manner.
Inform the editor if he will withdraw his written work.
Make a statement that the paper submitted for publication is original, has not been published anywhere in any language, and is not in the process of being submitted to another publisher.

Sekretariat :
Jurusan Teknik Industri
FTI UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta
d.a Jalan Babarsari 2 Tambakbayan Yogyakarta 55281
Telp. (0274) 486256
Website http://jurnal.upnyk.ac.id/index.php/opsi
email : jurnal.opsi@upnyk.ac.id

indexed by:

This work is Licensed Under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

View My Stats

Username
Password
Remember me